REKONSTRUKSI PENAFSIRAN IBNU JARIR AL-THABARI (224–310 H/839–923 M) TENTANG AYAT-AYAT GENDER
This article will unravel the thoughts of a classical exegete, namely Ibn Jarir Al-Thabari ( 224–310 H/839–923 AD ) about gender verses. This article refutes some of the claims of feminists that all interpretations of exegetes in the classical era were unfriendly and somewhat negative towards women. This is a qualitative research. The approach used is to follow Amin al-Khuli's approach, namely the ma fi al-Qur'an and ma hawla al-Qur'an approach and also the Schleiermacher approach which emphasizes two important aspects in the process of text interpretation, grammatical interpretation, and psychological interpretation. The conclusion of verse 1 and verse 34 of surah an-Nisa (4) which is the object of discussion is that al-Thabari's interpretation cannot be separated from the patriarchal culture inherent in his time and smells of gender bias. This can be seen when interpreting the nafs wahidah in verse 1 of Surah an-Nisa (4). He understood it as a figure of Adam -sex male. It is different when understanding the concept of qiwamah in verse 34, his opinion is: in line with those understood by contemporary scholars, and this distinguishes him from contemporaries or even after him. He also understands this concept functionally not in a structural form. This refutes the claim among feminists, such as Asma Lambrabet, who generalized that all commentators of the classical period used the concept of qiwamah as a proposition for male superiority even though al-Thabari was different from the others. In addition, he remains faithful in placing this verse in its context, namely only in the domestic sphere, not in the public sphere. Importantly, al-Tabari's paradigm of interpretation which is faithful to history leads him to a more literal understanding of the verse. This is seen when understanding the word dharaba. He understands the meaning with a physical beating, not with metaphorical meaning, even though the beating is light, does not hurt, and does not leave an impression.
Abou-Bakr, O. (2015). The Interpretive Legacy of Qiwamah as an Exegetical Construct. Men in Charge, 44–64.
Al-Ashfahani, A.-R. (2002). Mufradat Alfaz al-Qur’an (3rd ed.). Darul Qalam.
Al-Baghawi, A. M. al-H. ibn M. (1989). Ma’alim al-Tanzil (Vol. 2). Dar Thaibah.
Al-Baydhawi, N. A. al-K. A. ibn U. ibn M. al-Syayrazi al-Syafi’i. (n.d.). Anwar al-Tanzil wa Asrar al-Ta’wil (Vol. 2). Dar Ihya al-Turats al-Arabi.
Al-Khalidi, S. A. F. (n.d.). Ta’rif al-Darisin bi Manahij al-Mufassirin. Darul Qalam.
Al-Khathib, M. A. (1989). Ushul al-Hadits: Ulumuhu wa Mushthalahuhu. Darul Fikr.
Al-Thabari, A. J. M. (n.d.). Jami al-Bayan An Ta’wil Ayil Qur’an (II, Vol. 7). Maktabah Ibnu Taymiah.
Al-Thabari, A. J. M. (T.Th). Jami al-Bayan An Ta’wil Ayil Qur’an (Vol. 8). Maktabah Ibnu Taymiah.
Aminullah, M. (n.d.). Hermeneutika Dan Linguistik Perspektif Metode Tafsir Sastra Âmîn Al-Khûli. 24.
Ammar, N. H. (2007). Wife battery in Islam: A comprehensive understanding of interpretations. Violence against Women, 13(5), 516–526.
Barlas, A. (2001). Muslim women and sexual oppression: Reading liberation from the Quran. Macalester International, 10(1), 15.
Chaudhry, A. S. (2009). Wife-beating in the pre-modern Islamic tradition: An inter-disciplinary study of Hadīth, Qur’anic exegesis and Islamic jurisprudence [PhD Thesis]. New York University.
Devos, S. (n.d.). The feminist challenge of Qur’an verse 4:34: An analysis of progressive and reformist approaches and their impact in British Muslim communities. 42.
Farhan, A. (2016). Hermeneutika Romantik Schleiermacher Mengenai Laba Dalam Muqaddimah Ibnu Khaldun. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 7(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2016.04.7005
Fata, A. K., & Iderus, M. H. S. (2018). Feminism Paradigm In Gender Equality Argument of Nasaruddin Umar. KALAM, 12(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.24042/klm.v12i1.2248
Ghulayaini, M. (1993). Jami al-Durus al-Arabiyyah (Vol. 1). Al-Maktabah al-Ashriyyah.
Hassan, R. (1987). Equal before Allah? Woman-man equality in the Islamic tradition. Harvard Divinity Bulletin, 17(2), 2–14.
Hawwa, S. (2007). Al-Asas fi Al-Tafsir (7th ed., Vol. 1). Dar al-Salam.
Ibnu Katsir, I. A. al-F. I. (2000). Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Azhim (Vol. 3). Muassasah Qurthubah.
Ilyas, Y. (1998). Feminisme Dalam Kajian Tafsir Al-Qur’an Klasik dan Kontemporer. Pustaka Pelajar.
Ismail, N. B. (2017a). The Quranic Exegesis, Reformism, and Women in Twentieth Century Indonesia. Studia Islamika, 24(3), 469–501. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v24i3.5187
Ismail, N. B. (2017b). The Quranic Exegesis, Reformism, and Women in Twentieth Century Indonesia. Studia Islamika, 24(3), 469–501. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v24i3.5187
Janah, N. (2017). Telaah Buku Argumentasi Kesetaraan Gender Perspektif Al-Qur’an Karya Nasaruddin Umar. Sawwa: Jurnal Studi Gender, 12(2), 167. https://doi.org/10.21580/sa.v12i2.1707
Lamrabet, A. (2015). An Egalitarian Reading of the Concepts of ‘Khilafah’, ‘Wilayah’ and ‘Qiwamah.’ 2.
Ma, L. (2008). A Cultural Analysis on Women’s Issues in Islam. Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (in Asia), 2(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/19370679.2008.12023110
Manzhur, I. (n.d.). Lisan al-Arab (Vol. 4). Darul Ma’arif.
Mulalic, M. (2003). Al-Tabari: The Conception Of History. Afkar, 4, 183–202.
Rahman, Y. (2017). Q. 4: 34 And Disciplining A Wife: Modern Indonesian Muslim Scholars’interpretations Of The Qur’an. International Conference on Qur’an and Hadith Studies (ICQHS 2017).
Ramadhani, W. (2017). Amin Al-Khuli dan Metode Tafsir Sastrawi Atas Al-Qur’an. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alquran dan Tafsir, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.32505/tibyan.v2i1.222
Roded. (2015). Jewish and Islamic Religious Feminist Exegesis of the Sacred Books: Adam, Woman and Gender. Nashim: A Journal of Jewish Women’s Studies & Gender Issues, 29, 56. https://doi.org/10.2979/nashim.29.56
Shaikh, S. (1997). Exegetical Violence: Nushuz in Quranic Gender Ideology. Journal for Islamic Studies, 17, 49–73.
Shihab, M. Q. (2012). Tafsir al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan, dan Keserasian al-Qur’an (Vol. 2). Lentera Hati.
Sockness, B. W. (n.d.). The Forgotten Moralist: Friedrich Schleiermacher and the Science of Spirit on JSTOR. Retrieved June 16, 2020,
Suma, M. A. (2013). Ulumul Qur’an (1st ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Untung, S. H., & Idris, A. (2012). Telaah Kritis Terhadap Hadis Misoginis. Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam, 11(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v11i1.483
Val, M. S. M. (2013). Rethinking The Qiwamah: A Qur’an Ocentric Evaluation Of Modern Women Exegetes’ Perspectives. Al-Bayan Journal, 11(2), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.11136/jqh.1311.02.04
Wadud, A. (2015). The Ethics of Tawhid over the Ethics of Qiwamah. 2.
- There are currently no refbacks.